Assemblage is basically a collection of ideas,
things, or people. Johnson-Ellola and Selber’s say that assemblage is a controversial
term that in order to comment on the nature of writing in a remix culture we
must have assemblage. For now assemblage as is a writing practice they mention
in academic courses only beginning to seem on our gatherings despite the fact
that remixed artifacts are everywhere, all around us. Ellola and Selber believe
assemblages are text built primarily and explicitly from existing texts in order
to solve a writing communication problem in a new context. There really is not a line to be drawn because
it is said in the article that it is best that we copy original works due to
the fact that it makes a better writers. Like Johnson-Ellola and Selber
mentioned teachers should be encouraging students to learn ways to use existing
information to solve real problems. It does not mean that they will be copying
their whole lives it is just a helper into getting students started with their
own creation that solves real life situations. Not only that, but also creating
their own remixes. We do not always have to copy word for word, but doing so is
not where the line is drawn or should be drawn. In this article, as I got
towards the end I started getting confused because I did not really understand
the whole template part and the whole purpose of the architecture pattern. I
also did not understand why we needed to know that. Was it trying to explain
how individuals plagiarize?
No comments:
Post a Comment